|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIAL REPORT
The White House email controversy: a detour into mob journalism
By David Gewirtz
For the past few weeks, we've been conducting a detailed, in-depth technical analysis of the White House missing email controversy. Because very little information is easily available, we've had to take each step in sequence and carefully document our observations.
Earlier, we learned that the President's staff uses at least two domains for email: EOP.GOV for official business and GWB43.COM for political business. Last week, we explored GWB43.COM for clues into the White House email infrastructure and came up with some disturbing questions. This week, we take a strange detour into mob journalism as we continue to dig for the truth.
"We did find some amazingly immature behavior from a bunch of geeks."
|
It should be noted that we've thought very carefully about whether we should be covering this story. Even though our coverage is completely technical in nature, it does touch on political issues since we're looking at the email practices of a sitting President's administration.
Not only have we discovered a national security concern about email management, but we've also identified and will, in later articles, discuss a serious systemic concern in how the United States Government treats email. This is not a red state/blue state issue or even one of Republicans vs. Democrats (we'll talk later about similar email management problems in the Clinton administration).
Instead, this is about how non-technical people are relying almost totally on a technical solution they don't fully understand -- and how that lack of understanding could cause serious security failures for the United States Government. Further, since most other national governments likely rely on email within their infrastructure, this Special Report article series has lessons for national leaders and their advisors outside the Unites States, as well.
The fact is, if we are to take our jobs seriously here at ZATZ, there is no topic more appropriate for us to cover. At the core of the controversy is the question of email messages possibly lost during a transition from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook.
As publishers of the two leading magazines for both these messaging systems, we're in a unique place to look at what's going on from a completely non-partisan (and in this case, I mean IBM Lotus vs. Microsoft) perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Advertisement --
ONLINE GROUP CALENDAR - FOR UP TO 100 OF YOUR CLOSEST FRIENDS
Stay organized and in control with 24/7 access to all of your important events, projects and files --whether you're at work, at home or on the road.
You can share your calendar, projects and files so everyone in your office is up to date. Plus, search your entire group to find times when everyone is available to meet, manage company resources and much more.
Organize your entire team for as low as $9.95 per year (and yes, that's where the decimal place is supposed to be!)
Tap here to get started right away. |
-- Advertisement --
Planning Exchange upgrade? Must-read report on compelling alternatives.
Exchange 2007 comes with a challenging adoption path. Plus, it's still plagued by performance issues, a closed database architecture driving complexity around backup and high availability, and high storage costs.
This report documents cost-effective, drop-in Exchange alternatives with high availability and archiving, unlimited mailbox size, and support for new devices such as BlackBerry.
Download your copy here. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Power Magazine for Microsoft Outlook and Exchange Users at OutlookPower.com
Copyright © 1998-2009, ZATZ Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Outlook is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|