Search OutlookPower's 9,596 Outlook and all-things-email article archive 
Home
EasyPrint
News details Click here for the RSS feed's XML code. This is not a browser URL.
Articles-only Click here for the RSS feed's XML code. This is not a browser URL.
Twitter Feed Click here for the Twitter feed.
SPECIAL REPORT
The great Windows Vista antivirus war
By David Gewirtz

"You'll never believe what those bastards are doing now."

Those were the first words out of my buddy Steve's mouth. Steve manages a computer network for an exclusive private school, so I figured he might be refering to something computer related. Or something a teacher had done. Or some crime committed by the Democrats or by the Republicans (Steve's non-partisan when it comes to being annoyed). Or, perhaps, it was the Purple People in the Trees. Again. Steve's like that.

"But what's the truth? What's really going on? I had the opportunity to interview both Microsoft and Symantec on this issue."

Honestly, I had no idea who the bastards were, but I'd soon find out. Apparently the target of Steve's wrath was Symantec. Even though I'd once worked there as an executive, it was so long ago that I felt completely comfortable letting Steve go to town badmouthing them.

It seems Symantec was suing Microsoft. Steve's also not a huge fan of our Redmond friends, but this time he was on their side. After a long series of invectives, I finally got to the heart of the matter. Symantec was suing Microsoft because Microsoft refused to open up Vista (Microsoft's upcoming new OS) in a way that would allow Symantec to provide the full level of virus protection the antivirus vendor wanted to provide.

I didn't understand. Wouldn't that make Steve angry at Microsoft, not Symantec? Apparently not. The issue was that Microsoft had closed many of the kernel-hacking loopholes (like the one that let Sony install back-door rootkits in an incredibly idiotic, misguided, and probably criminal attempt to prevent music piracy). Microsoft had closed the loopholes so hard that Symantec couldn't tunnel into the kernel far enough to provide the level of virus protection they wanted to provide.

Steve's premise was that closing security loopholes was good and any company trying to force open security flaws simply so they could sell products that protect from security flaws was bad. Put that way, I had to agree.

From what my buddy was telling me, it seemed Symantec was trying to force Microsoft to create Vista security holes simply so they could sell more copies of their antivirus program.

But what's the truth? What's really going on? There are always two sides to every story and this one seemed no different.

To get to the bottom of the issue and try to derive a better understanding, I decided to speak with both Symantec and Microsoft. I had the opportunity to conduct exclusive interviews with Cris Paden, Manager on the Corporate Communication Team at Symantec and Adrien Robinson, Director of Communications, Microsoft Security Technology Unit.

Let's start with Symantec's side of the story.


1  ·  2  ·  3  ·  4  ·  5  ·  6  ·  7  ·  Next »
Other articles you might like
Home > Online Safety > Virus protection (7 articles)
   Readers clock in on Microsoft v. Symantec
   Another month, another virus
   How the SoBig.F virus works
Home > Extras > Interviews (6 articles)
   Defend yourself from phishing
   A developer's perspective on Outlook 2007
   Learn more about privacy, identity theft, and anonymous browsing
Home > Using Outlook > Migration & Setup > Updates > Windows Vista (3 articles)
   When should you upgrade to Outlook 2007 and Vista?
   A sneak peek at Vista's Windows Mail, Windows Calendar, and Windows Contacts
Get Weekly Email Updates
Subscribe to our regular weekly email newsletter. It's packed with tips, reviews, deep analysis, and the latest news.
 
Recent OutlookPower Articles
The strange case of Outlook losing notes and requiring passwords
Why I'm choosing to stick with Outlook 2007
Three ways to avoid email distraction and take back control of your time
Twenty ways to use email to commit career suicide
The two most motivational words in the English language
Diagnosing corrupted email headers
Email offenders
OutlookPower News Center
New Filing Assistant from Allometa
Dropbox bridges gaps in Microsoft's mobile sync
SmartBear Software Releases AQtime 7.0 Pro
6 Super Wi-Fi Tools for Windows
Microsoft Revives Windows 7 Family Pack Discount
Microsoft releases FixIt for critical flaw in 100 apps
M-Files Cloud Vault Easy, Hosted Document Management
>> Read all the news
More from the ZATZ journals
Computing Unplugged: Smartphone smarts for a mobile world
David Gewirtz Online: CNN commentary and analysis
DominoPower: It's time for Lotus to double-down on Linux and open source
-- Advertisement --

Centrally managed library houses boilerplate template for repetitive person-to-person email
COPY-and-PASTE from SENT ITEMS is a crude approach to repetitive email tasks, yet we all do it at times. Now, a slick online alternative saves time for senders, assures brand consistency, and greatly improves the quality of outgoing written communications. This service is built around a powerful integrated mail-merge functionality and is super easy for users and administrators. Use it internally, with home-based employees, or externally with dealers, distributors, service-reps, etc.

Learn more and try our LIVE DEMO.
ZATZ Home  ·  News  ·  Back Issues  ·  Credits/Trademarks ·  Link To Us
The Power Magazine for Microsoft Outlook and Exchange Users at OutlookPower.com
Copyright © 1998-2010, ZATZ Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide.
Outlook is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation.
Editor's Login